🚀 go-pugleaf

Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts. on Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of. the MI5 persecution, from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet. as possible, in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they. would simply go away
of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour. some people employ
against bullies; if the bullies. arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go. away and victimize someone else.

Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work.. The quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise from. the Security Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV. news at all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they continued to follow me wherever I went,. they
continued to induce harassment at work. by managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to. commit suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right". by ever
more extreme forms of. abuse.

Finally,. in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had had
accounts. with internet providers in Ontario, Canada. I discovered the
cornucopia of internet. newsgroups, on every topic from consumer
electronics,. to politics and legal topics, and I discovered online
services such as Compuserve and AOL. In May 1995,. I made the first posting
to the conspiracy newsgroup,. on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame".

BBC's. Hidden Shame

The internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached. its fourth
anniversary,. started with an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce
here.

Date: Thu May . 4 18:27:24 1995
Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy
Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame

Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The. ones which watched you
back? Which you could never get rid of, only the. sound could be turned down?

Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare. follow into
the world after him. Since 1990 the British. have been waging war against one of their
own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and. a campaign of abuse in the
transmitted media in their efforts to. humiliate their "victim".

And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do. is not even illegal - the
UK has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does. it proscribe harassment
or. abuse except in the case of racial abuse.

A lot of people in England know this to be. going on, yet so far they have maintained
perfect "omerta"; not a sound,. not a squeak has escaped into the English press, and for
all the covert harassment. absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain.

Have. the British gone mad? I think we should be told

At this point, I. did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was still unsure
that they were. the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In
followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors. have never
denied the claim; so I think my guess is. valid. (The Security Service
Tribunal in. 1997 have said "no determination in your favour was made", but
it is a. well established fact that MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal
which has never found in favour. of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can be
drawn. from this.)

This first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts. were made to
the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but also. uk.legal and
uk.politics (which is now called uk.politics.misc).. Some time ago I tried
to take the battle to. the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now
called. UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles were censored by the
forum operators. Such censorship. is impossible on the internet newsgroups.

Police. Refuse to Act

I. have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who have each
time refused to. help.

From:. Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police. Doing Their
Job?
Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun Apr  7. 21:13:30 1996

In article. <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net>
      .     bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes:

>Last Easter (1995) I went into. the local police station in London and spoke to
>an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible
>evidence; what people said, in many cases years. ago, is beyond proof, and
>without something to support my. statements I cannot expect a police officer to
>take the. complaint seriously.

This in itself dos not suggest that. the police have it in for you. The old bill
operates on extremely tight. spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael
Howard, and without evidence, they often have. higher priorities than chasing something
that cannot. go to court.

I doubt that the police are actually being leant. on, but they probably realise that if
they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always. stays away from
anything that looks like it. has Defence, Security or secret service interest already,
because they. realise that they are below these government agencies in the general
pecking. order.

If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they. would
show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because. that bored desk seargant
with only. five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with
somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington.  He would rather. deal with the
lost dogs and driving licence producers,. eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss
off home at the end of his shift than have some. high ranking spook having a go at his
boss. and getting him a bollocking.

In short, you. have earned much sympathy but little surprise.  Just remember that saying
about the enemy of your. enemies.

Most recently, I wrote in March 1999 to. Charing Cross Police Station
CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my letter. When. I phoned them
up, the detective Id written to treated me to a sadly not unusual. display
of police bigotry, with. an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish".

It would be nice to think that such. uneducated bigotry is  something other
than wholly typical of police behaviour,. but unfortunately that is an
illusion that is. rapidly dispelled.

Uncorruptible Jon Snow of. Channel Four News